TRADERLEDGER 0xdcac85ec…e99ce2

Monthly record one cell per month · 36 months · 34 with data · 20 green / 14 red

JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC
2023−46K
2024+100K−142K−186K+234K+267K+52K+602K+45K−166K+57K+6.9K+7.3M
2025−1.8M−1.5M−811K+8.2K+761K+933K−758K−37K+3.5M+21K+30K+62K
2026−91K−19K+46K+378−69−15K−2+226K+394K··
worst monthno databest monthintensity is relative to this trader’s own biggest month ($7.29M)

Capital what they started with and everything moved since

Starting capital
$30,309
equity on 29 Nov 2023, before that day’s flow
Cash injected
$13.93M
every deposit since
Cash withdrawn
$21.82M
net moved out
Net injected
−$7.89M
deposits − withdrawals
Total ever invested
$13.96M
starting capital + deposits
Profit over window
+$9.18M
29 Nov 2023 → 16 Sep 2026
Return on invested
+65.8%
profit ÷ every dollar put in
Peak equity
$7.91M
now $1.32M
Equity fell $6.59M from its peak on 10 Sep 2025 — was that trading or cashing out?
Cashing Out
Trading P&L since the peak
+$3.63M
Net flow since the peak
−$10.22M
  deposits / withdrawals
$6.49M / $16.71M
Equity change
−$6.59M
Exact by construction: the exchange’s own accounting makes every change in account value either P&L or flow (Δequity = ΔP&L + net flow), and the two above reconcile to −$0. An account can shed most of its equity while trading profitably, and a rising one can be hiding losses behind deposits.
Net flow comes from the exchange’s own accounting (F = ΔaccountValue − ΔpnlHistory), not the ledger — the ledger misses perp↔spot moves on dex-abstraction accounts entirely. 94 equity points on file.

Risk : reward and frequency closed round trips only

Risk : reward
1 : 2.09
risks $100 on average to make $208
Win rate
69.6%
55 of 79 closed trades
Expectancy
+$114
per trade · 1.15R
Profit factor
4.78
gross $11,415 / $2,389
Best trade
+$6,111
worst −$359
Trades / active month
19.8
4 active months of 36
Median gap
0.0d
longest quiet stretch 92d
Win / loss split
55 / 24
Read risk : reward as "risks 1 to make N" — average loss against average win. On its own it says nothing: 1 : 5 at a 10% hit rate loses money. Read it with the win rate beside it, or read expectancy, which already combines the two.

PnL and drawdown mark-to-market P&L, account equity, and the underwater curve

9.2M0−274K +9.2M 0 −4.5M −4.5M Nov 2023Nov 2024Dec 2025Sep 2026
Net P&L, mark-to-market Account equity (capital in and out) Drawdown from peak P&L
Net P&L
+$9.18M
peak $9.24M · low −$274,027
Capital injected
$13.93M
withdrew $21.82M · net −$7.89M
Peak equity
$7.91M
now $1.32M
Profit on capital
+65.8%
on $13.96M ever put in
Max drawdown
−$4.54M
peak-to-trough · Apr 2025
… of peak equity
−57.4%
against $7.91M, the largest the account was ever seen to hold
… of capital committed
−32.5%
against $13.96M ever put in
Longest underwater
259d
below a previous peak
Average leverage
0.00×
median 0.00× · peak 0.03× · 79 trades
Sampling
11.0d
94 points · 29 Nov 2023 → 16 Sep 2026
The P&L line is mark-to-market — it comes from the exchange’s own pnlHistory and already carries open-position profit, not just closed trades. What it is not is continuous: portfolio returns about a hundred points whatever the account’s age, so this wallet is sampled every 11.0 days and any drawdown that opened and closed between two samples is invisible. Every drawdown figure above is a floor, not the true worst. Continuous intraday drawdown only starts accumulating from the position tracker, which has been running since 12 Sep. The two percentages divide the same dollar loss by different things: There is no single right denominator, so both are named rather than one being picked: the largest the account was ever seen to hold, and every dollar ever committed to it. Either can pass 100% on a leveraged account — this wallet gave back $4.54M against a peak P&L of $9.24M. Dividing by peak P&L is deliberately not shown as a headline: on a wallet that was barely profitable before losing, it produces numbers in the thousands of percent. A drawdown measured on raw account value is deliberately not shown at all: this wallet withdrew $21.82M, so its account value fell −95.9% from peak — a figure that reads like a blow-up and is nothing of the kind. Every drawdown above is measured on P&L, which withdrawals cannot move.

Current trades open perp positions and spot holdings, live

Open perp positions · 0
CoinLong/Short Open Interest 3D OI Notional UnrealizedLevLiq px
flat — or not tracked
Spot holdings · 79
TokenSizeValueCost Unrealized
HYPE5,845.3852 $454,359 $356,895 +$97,463
USDE259,029.8529 $259,030 $258,818 +$211
PURR750,000.2360 $75,390 $73,290 +$2,100
USDT061,562.9023 $61,563 $61,506 +$57
CFX0390,973.9500 $16,573 $19,125 −$2,552
JEFF2,890.4320 $7,323 $16,887 −$9,564
USDC5,115.3711 $5,115 — —
UBTC0.0553 $4,188 $4,461 −$274
UETH1.7566 $3,924 $4,006 −$82
UZEC1.0633 $1,349 $1,302 +$47
ATEHUN1,351.0363 $932 $8,993 −$8,060
POINTS294,783.1930 $780 $14,626 −$13,845
VAPOR13,573,864.6469 $600 $116,221 −$115,621
PIP293.9955 $542 $9,177 −$8,634
USOL4.5621 $409 $675 −$266
UPUMP104,773.4655 $389 $661 −$272
LICK6,395,340.3092 $373 — —
CATBAL496.4099 $254 $10,547 −$10,293
RETARD7,857.1130 $218 $10,448 −$10,229
UXPL3,168.9312 $183 $589 −$406

Recent trades closed in the last 30 days · 0 closed

CoinLong/Short InOut HoldSize NotionalLev FillsFeesP/L
no round trip closed in the last 30 days and none open
A round trip is flat→flat: fill → order → decision → campaign, with same-millisecond fills re-chained by startPosition and TWAP slices merged by tid. In and Out are when it opened and closed, with the size-weighted average price of the fills each way where it is known; P/L is before fees. A trip marked censored was already open where the history starts, so its entry is not known. A trip marked open is still held: its P/L is what it has made so far, the parts closed plus the live unrealised figure.

Trade history every closed round trip on record · 79 closed · since 10 Jan 2026 · click a title to sort

The trades on record start 10 Jan 2026 08:18 UTC — Hyperliquid serves an account only about its last 10,000 fills, so a busy trader’s older trades cannot be read from it. Closed round trips on record add up to +$9,026 (before fees); Hyperliquid’s own all-time perp P/L for the account is +$675,361, which also counts funding and what open positions are up or down. The difference was made before the first trade on record.
CoinLong/Short InOut HoldSize NotionalLev FillsFeesP/L
xyz:CXMTliq Short 15 Jul 26 02:52
@ 6.0100
15 Jul 26 04:03
@ 7.2126
1h 11m 1.8000 $11 <0.01× 2 −$0 −$2
para:BTCDliq Short 14 Apr 26 14:15
@ 60.35
28 May 26 08:43
@ 62.00
43d 18h 79.0000 $4,793 0.01× 9 $2 −$131
para:OTHERSliq Short 08 Apr 26 22:59
@ 194.54
06 May 26 08:55
@ 186.93
27d 9h 8.1600 $1,612 <0.01× 13 $1 +$62
para:TOTAL2liq Short 14 Apr 26 13:43
@ 1,015.00
17 Apr 26 13:10
@ 1,034.69
2d 23h 0.9820 $997 <0.01× 42 $1 −$19
para:BTCD Long 07 Apr 26 04:45
@ 57.41
14 Apr 26 14:15
@ 60.42
7d 9h 19.2000 $1,150 <0.01× 20 $1 +$58
para:TOTAL2 Long 03 Apr 26 00:09
@ 915.00
14 Apr 26 13:43
@ 975.11
11d 13h 1.0930 $1,000 <0.01× 20 $1 +$66
para:BTCD Short 06 Apr 26 17:07
@ 60.50
07 Apr 26 04:45
@ 57.50
11h 37m 1.9000 $115 <0.01× 3 $0 +$6
para:BTCD Long 03 Apr 26 00:11
@ 56.00
06 Apr 26 17:07
@ 60.43
3d 16h 7.0000 $392 <0.01× 13 $0 +$36
para:BTCD Short 03 Apr 26 00:07
@ 61.00
03 Apr 26 00:11
@ 56.47
4m 23.9000 $1,458 <0.01× 25 $1 +$108
para:BTCD Short 01 Apr 26 17:56
@ 61.00
01 Apr 26 17:57
@ 56.00
57s 24.7000 $1,507 <0.01× 2 $1 +$124
page 1 of 8 · 79 tradesRows per page · · ·

History every closed round trip on record, grouped by coin · 72 coins · since 10 Jan 2026 (see Trade history)

CoinP/LTradesWin rate L / SAvg holdNotionalAvg levFeesShare Last
CRV +$6,111 1 100% 0 / 1 — $6,966 <0.01× $0 +45% 10MO AGO
ASTER +$696 1 100% 0 / 1 — $13,863 0.01× $0 +5% 10MO AGO
SUI +$445 1 100% 0 / 1 — $44,121 0.03× $1 +3% 10MO AGO
WIF +$389 1 100% 0 / 1 — $6,107 <0.01× $0 +3% 10MO AGO
STRK +$261 1 100% 0 / 1 — $6,282 <0.01× $0 +2% 10MO AGO