TRADERLEDGER 0x807a2e2e…0daca1

Monthly record one cell per month · 36 months · 22 with data · 14 green / 8 red

JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC
2023·
2024············
2025−1.5M+1.8M−3.6M+2.8M+8.8M+1.8M+2.4M+1.9M+74K+299K−3.9M−3.3M
2026+2.5M−1.6M+3.8M−69K+5.3M+964K−2.3M+5.6M−523K+17K·
worst monthno databest monthintensity is relative to this trader’s own biggest month ($8.85M)

Capital what they started with and everything moved since

Starting capital
$1.38M
equity on 04 Dec 2024, before that day’s flow
Cash injected
$16.80M
every deposit since
Cash withdrawn
$40.09M
net moved out
Net injected
−$23.30M
deposits − withdrawals
Total ever invested
$18.18M
starting capital + deposits
Profit over window
+$35.01M
04 Dec 2024 → 16 Sep 2026
Return on invested
+192.6%
profit ÷ every dollar put in
Peak equity
$23.42M
now $13.09M
Equity fell $10.32M from its peak on 28 May 2025 — was that trading or cashing out?
Cashing Out
Trading P&L since the peak
+$12.96M
Net flow since the peak
−$23.28M
  deposits / withdrawals
$10.27M / $33.55M
Equity change
−$10.32M
Exact by construction: the exchange’s own accounting makes every change in account value either P&L or flow (Δequity = ΔP&L + net flow), and the two above reconcile to $0. An account can shed most of its equity while trading profitably, and a rising one can be hiding losses behind deposits.
Net flow comes from the exchange’s own accounting (F = ΔaccountValue − ΔpnlHistory), not the ledger — the ledger misses perp↔spot moves on dex-abstraction accounts entirely. 94 equity points on file.

Risk : reward and frequency closed round trips only

Risk : reward
1 : 1.23
risks $14,015 on average to make $17,193
Win rate
66.7%
2 of 3 closed trades
Expectancy
+$6,790
per trade · 0.48R
Profit factor
2.45
gross $34,386 / $14,015
Best trade
+$17,838
worst −$14,015
Trades / active month
2.0
2 active months of 36
Median gap
1.8d
longest quiet stretch 36d
Win / loss split
2 / 1
Read risk : reward as "risks 1 to make N" — average loss against average win. On its own it says nothing: 1 : 5 at a 10% hit rate loses money. Read it with the win rate beside it, or read expectancy, which already combines the two.

PnL and drawdown mark-to-market P&L, account equity, and the underwater curve

34M0−2.0M +33M 0 −12M −12M Dec 2024Jul 2025Feb 2026Sep 2026
Net P&L, mark-to-market Account equity (capital in and out) Drawdown from peak P&L
Net P&L
+$33.04M
peak $34.19M · low −$1.97M
Capital injected
$16.80M
withdrew $40.09M · net −$23.30M
Peak equity
$23.42M
now $13.09M
Profit on capital
+192.6%
on $18.18M ever put in
Max drawdown
−$12.09M
peak-to-trough · Jan 2026
… of peak equity
−51.6%
against $23.42M, the largest the account was ever seen to hold
… of capital committed
−66.5%
against $18.18M ever put in
Longest underwater
245d
below a previous peak
Average leverage
0.05×
median 0.08× · peak 0.10× · 4 trades
Sampling
7.0d
94 points · 04 Dec 2024 → 16 Sep 2026
The P&L line is mark-to-market — it comes from the exchange’s own pnlHistory and already carries open-position profit, not just closed trades. What it is not is continuous: portfolio returns about a hundred points whatever the account’s age, so this wallet is sampled every 7.0 days and any drawdown that opened and closed between two samples is invisible. Every drawdown figure above is a floor, not the true worst. Continuous intraday drawdown only starts accumulating from the position tracker, which has been running since 12 Sep. The two percentages divide the same dollar loss by different things: There is no single right denominator, so both are named rather than one being picked: the largest the account was ever seen to hold, and every dollar ever committed to it. Either can pass 100% on a leveraged account — this wallet gave back $12.09M against a peak P&L of $34.19M. Dividing by peak P&L is deliberately not shown as a headline: on a wallet that was barely profitable before losing, it produces numbers in the thousands of percent. A drawdown measured on raw account value is deliberately not shown at all: this wallet withdrew $40.09M, so its account value fell −71.8% from peak — a figure that reads like a blow-up and is nothing of the kind. Every drawdown above is measured on P&L, which withdrawals cannot move.

Current trades open perp positions and spot holdings, live

Open perp positions · 0
CoinLong/Short Open Interest 3D OI Notional UnrealizedLevLiq px
flat — or not tracked
Spot holdings · 17
TokenSizeValueCost Unrealized
USDC842,065.2267 $842,065 — —
MAX1,260,531,848.5446 $252 — —
UETH0.0692 $154 $158 −$4
LATINA55,572.1878 $11 — —
JPEG82,236.8421 $4 $1,250 −$1,246
TIME8,333.3333 $1 $31 −$30
MUNCH49,326.4140 $1 $0 +$0
NEIRO2,567.1808 $0 $0 +$0
BERA410.8532 $0 $0 −$0
LICKO6,423.1274 $0 $0 +$0
PEAR1,114.5716 $0 $0 +$0
SENT6,000.0000 $0 $6,000 −$6,000
HYPE0.0008 $0 $0 +$0
KNTQ0.0169 $0 $0 +$0
MEOW1.5840 $0 $0 +$0
VAULT0.0308 $0 $0 +$0
STAR0.0218 $0 $0 +$0

Recent trades closed in the last 30 days and every position still open · 1 closed, 1 open · open first, then newest first

CoinLong/Short InOut HoldSize NotionalLev FillsFeesP/L
MEGAopen Long 30 Oct 26 09:55
@ 0.0455
open 8d 9h 6,583,856.0000 $299,557 0.02× 2484 $94 $0
BTC Short 29 Oct 26 22:15
@ 78,759.53
30 Oct 26 11:19
@ 77,576.32
13h 3m 13.9862 $1.10M 0.08× 408 $618 +$16,548
A round trip is flat→flat: fill → order → decision → campaign, with same-millisecond fills re-chained by startPosition and TWAP slices merged by tid. In and Out are when it opened and closed, with the size-weighted average price of the fills each way where it is known; P/L is before fees. A trip marked censored was already open where the history starts, so its entry is not known. A trip marked open is still held: its P/L is what it has made so far, the parts closed plus the live unrealised figure.

Trade history every round trip on record · 3 closed, 1 open · since 21 Sep 2026 · click a title to sort

The trades on record start 21 Sep 2026 19:05 UTC — Hyperliquid serves an account only about its last 10,000 fills, so a busy trader’s older trades cannot be read from it. Closed round trips on record add up to +$20,371 (before fees); Hyperliquid’s own all-time perp P/L for the account is +$3.79M, which also counts funding and what open positions are up or down. The difference was made before the first trade on record.
CoinLong/Short InOut HoldSize NotionalLev FillsFeesP/L
MEGAopen Long 30 Oct 26 09:55
@ 0.0455
open 8d 9h 6,583,856.0000 $299,557 0.02× 2484 $94 $0
BTC Short 29 Oct 26 22:15
@ 78,759.53
30 Oct 26 11:19
@ 77,576.32
13h 3m 13.9862 $1.10M 0.08× 408 $618 +$16,548
LIT Short 23 Sep 26 13:50
@ 5.4614
28 Sep 26 08:52
@ 4.4049
4d 19h 16,884.0000 $94,167 0.01× 429 $29 +$17,838
LITcensored Short 21 Sep 26 19:05 23 Sep 26 08:00
@ 4.9341
≥ 1d 12h 258,641.0000 $1.25M 0.10× 5149 $380 −$14,015
page 1 of 1 · 4 tradesRows per page · · ·

History every closed round trip on record, grouped by coin · 2 coins · since 21 Sep 2026 (see Trade history)

CoinP/LTradesWin rate L / SAvg holdNotionalAvg levFeesShare Last
BTC +$16,548 1 100% 0 / 1 13h 3m $1.10M 0.08× $618 +81% 8D AGO
LIT +$3,823 2 50% 0 / 2 4d 19h $1.35M 0.05× $409 +19% 40D AGO