TRADERLEDGER 0x5d2f4460…b39bb7

Monthly record one cell per month · 36 months · 23 with data · 14 green / 8 red

JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC
2023·
2024············
2025+115K+5.2M+255K−1.6M+2.3M+7.6M−9.0M+11M+95K+14M+26M+2.5M
2026+55K+39M−264K−144K+2.1M−413K0+1.2M−45K−280K−9
worst monthno databest monthintensity is relative to this trader’s own biggest month ($38.77M)

Capital what they started with and everything moved since

Starting capital
$1.00M
equity on 25 Dec 2024, before that day’s flow
Cash injected
$86.60M
every deposit since
Cash withdrawn
$146.15M
net moved out
Net injected
−$59.55M
deposits − withdrawals
Total ever invested
$87.60M
starting capital + deposits
Profit over window
+$64.88M
25 Dec 2024 → 16 Sep 2026
Return on invested
+74.1%
profit ÷ every dollar put in
Peak equity
$19.33M
now $6.32M
Equity fell $13.01M from its peak on 08 Oct 2025 — was that trading or cashing out?
Cashing Out
Trading P&L since the peak
+$70.49M
Net flow since the peak
−$83.50M
  deposits / withdrawals
$12.00M / $95.50M
Equity change
−$13.01M
Exact by construction: the exchange’s own accounting makes every change in account value either P&L or flow (Δequity = ΔP&L + net flow), and the two above reconcile to $0. An account can shed most of its equity while trading profitably, and a rising one can be hiding losses behind deposits.
Net flow comes from the exchange’s own accounting (F = ΔaccountValue − ΔpnlHistory), not the ledger — the ledger misses perp↔spot moves on dex-abstraction accounts entirely. 92 equity points on file.

Risk : reward and frequency closed round trips only

Risk : reward
1 : 89.59
risks $109,117 on average to make $9.78M
Win rate
36.4%
4 of 11 closed trades
Expectancy
+$3.50M
per trade · 31.94R
Profit factor
59.73
gross $39.11M / $654,704
Best trade
+$38.77M
worst −$438,348
Trades / active month
1.8
8 active months of 36
Median gap
13.1d
longest quiet stretch 106d
Win / loss split
4 / 6
Read risk : reward as "risks 1 to make N" — average loss against average win. On its own it says nothing: 1 : 5 at a 10% hit rate loses money. Read it with the win rate beside it, or read expectancy, which already combines the two.

PnL and drawdown mark-to-market P&L, account equity, and the underwater curve

66M0−5.6M +65M 0 −22M −22M Dec 2024Jul 2025Feb 2026Sep 2026
Net P&L, mark-to-market Account equity (capital in and out) Drawdown from peak P&L
Net P&L
+$64.88M
peak $65.88M · low −$5.61M
Capital injected
$86.60M
withdrew $146.15M · net −$59.55M
Peak equity
$19.33M
now $6.32M
Profit on capital
+74.1%
on $87.60M ever put in
Max drawdown
−$21.69M
peak-to-trough · Oct 2025
… of peak equity
−112.2%
against $19.33M, the largest the account was ever seen to hold — the loss exceeded this, which a leveraged account can do and sparse sampling makes more likely
… of capital committed
−24.8%
against $87.60M ever put in
Longest underwater
98d
below a previous peak
Average leverage
2.22×
median 0.33× · peak 24.38× · 14 trades
Sampling
6.9d
92 points · 25 Dec 2024 → 16 Sep 2026
The P&L line is mark-to-market — it comes from the exchange’s own pnlHistory and already carries open-position profit, not just closed trades. What it is not is continuous: portfolio returns about a hundred points whatever the account’s age, so this wallet is sampled every 6.9 days and any drawdown that opened and closed between two samples is invisible. Every drawdown figure above is a floor, not the true worst. Continuous intraday drawdown only starts accumulating from the position tracker, which has been running since 12 Sep. The two percentages divide the same dollar loss by different things: There is no single right denominator, so both are named rather than one being picked: the largest the account was ever seen to hold, and every dollar ever committed to it. Either can pass 100% on a leveraged account — this wallet gave back $21.69M against a peak P&L of $65.88M. Dividing by peak P&L is deliberately not shown as a headline: on a wallet that was barely profitable before losing, it produces numbers in the thousands of percent. A drawdown measured on raw account value is deliberately not shown at all: this wallet withdrew $146.15M, so its account value fell −73.2% from peak — a figure that reads like a blow-up and is nothing of the kind. Every drawdown above is measured on P&L, which withdrawals cannot move.

Current trades open perp positions and spot holdings, live

Open perp positions · 0
CoinLong/Short Open Interest 3D OI Notional UnrealizedLevLiq px
flat — or not tracked
Spot holdings · 3
TokenSizeValueCost Unrealized
USDC2,940,918.8554 $2.94M — —
HYPE0.0175 $1 $0 +$1
MAX1,145,908.1438 $0 — —

Recent trades closed in the last 30 days and every position still open · 2 closed, 3 open · open first, then newest first

CoinLong/Short InOut HoldSize NotionalLev FillsFeesP/L
xyz:AAPLopen Long 03 Nov 26 02:38
@ 329.60
open 4d 17h 6,406.1150 $2.09M 0.33× 558 $57 $0
xyz:SP500open Long 07 Apr 26 03:48
@ 6,970.52
open 214d 15h 1,200.0680 $8.59M 1.50× 667 $226 $0
xyz:XYZ100open Long 17 Dec 25 09:02
@ 27,181.64
open 325d 10h 825.0284 $24.01M 2.59× 5606 $2,934 +$3.52M
xyz:AAPLliq Long 21 Oct 26 09:53
@ 337.64
02 Nov 26 22:28
@ 328.55
12d 12h 1.0000 $338 <0.01× 4 $0 −$9
xyz:AAPL Long 21 Jul 26 03:09
@ 320.07
13 Oct 26 14:07
@ 325.57
84d 10h 16,761.6090 $5.60M 0.84× 5062 $511 +$158,697
A round trip is flat→flat: fill → order → decision → campaign, with same-millisecond fills re-chained by startPosition and TWAP slices merged by tid. In and Out are when it opened and closed, with the size-weighted average price of the fills each way where it is known; P/L is before fees. A trip marked censored was already open where the history starts, so its entry is not known. A trip marked open is still held: its P/L is what it has made so far, the parts closed plus the live unrealised figure.

Trade history every round trip on record · 11 closed, 3 open · since 26 Jun 2025 · click a title to sort

The trades on record start 26 Jun 2025 07:31 UTC — Hyperliquid serves an account only about its last 10,000 fills, so a busy trader’s older trades cannot be read from it. Closed round trips on record add up to +$38.45M (before fees); Hyperliquid’s own all-time perp P/L for the account is +$64.47M, which also counts funding and what open positions are up or down. The difference was made before the first trade on record.
CoinLong/Short InOut HoldSize NotionalLev FillsFeesP/L
xyz:AAPLopen Long 03 Nov 26 02:38
@ 329.60
open 4d 17h 6,406.1150 $2.09M 0.33× 558 $57 $0
xyz:SP500open Long 07 Apr 26 03:48
@ 6,970.52
open 214d 15h 1,200.0680 $8.59M 1.50× 667 $226 $0
xyz:XYZ100open Long 17 Dec 25 09:02
@ 27,181.64
open 325d 10h 825.0284 $24.01M 2.59× 5606 $2,934 +$3.52M
xyz:AAPLliq Long 21 Oct 26 09:53
@ 337.64
02 Nov 26 22:28
@ 328.55
12d 12h 1.0000 $338 <0.01× 4 $0 −$9
xyz:AAPL Long 21 Jul 26 03:09
@ 320.07
13 Oct 26 14:07
@ 325.57
84d 10h 16,761.6090 $5.60M 0.84× 5062 $511 +$158,697
xyz:SKHX Short 03 Aug 26 05:06
@ 1,104.03
01 Oct 26 08:22
@ 1,323.20
59d 3h 2,000.0000 $2.78M 0.54× 886 $139 −$438,348
xyz:NVDA Long 31 Aug 26 11:14
@ 222.98
17 Sep 26 06:26
@ 214.79
16d 19h 5,454.0000 $1.26M 0.20× 605 $64 −$44,618
xyz:AAPL Long 21 Jul 26 02:54
@ 326.33
21 Jul 26 02:57
@ 326.33
3m 1.0000 $326 <0.01× 2 $0 $0
xyz:CL Long 08 Apr 26 02:06
@ 97.00
12 Apr 26 23:37
@ 93.59
4d 21h 30,000.0000 $2.94M 0.47× 775 $191 −$102,391
xyz:CLliq Long 07 Apr 26 16:59
@ 114.19
07 Apr 26 22:40
@ 100.38
5h 41m 3,000.0000 $342,720 0.06× 60 $34 −$41,433
page 1 of 2 · 14 tradesRows per page · · ·

History every closed round trip on record, grouped by coin · 8 coins · since 26 Jun 2025 (see Trade history)

CoinP/LTradesWin rate L / SAvg holdNotionalAvg levFeesShare Last
BTC +$38.77M 1 100% 0 / 1 — $228.93M 24.38× $54,908 +98% 9MO AGO
xyz:AAPL +$158,688 3 33% 3 / 0 32d 7h $5.60M 0.29× $511 +0% 5D AGO
ETH +$122,849 1 100% 0 / 1 20d 1h $2.20M 0.14× $359 +0% 14MO AGO
LIT +$55,031 1 100% 0 / 1 17d 1h $155,083 0.02× $48 +0% 10MO AGO
HYPE −$27,906 1 0% 0 / 1 14d 7h $250,001 0.02× $29 −0% 14MO AGO