Capital what they started with and everything moved since
Starting capital
$494
equity on 25 Jun 2026, before that day’s flow
Cash injected
$502,712
every deposit since
Cash withdrawn
$98,881
net moved out
Net injected
+$403,831
deposits − withdrawals
Total ever invested
$503,206
starting capital + deposits
Profit over window
+$80,628
25 Jun 2026 → 03 Oct 2026
Return on invested
+16.0%
profit ÷ every dollar put in
Peak equity
$485,261
now $484,952
Equity fell $309 from its peak on
29 Sep 2026 — was that trading or cashing out?
Both · 100% of the fall is trading, 0% is money taken out
- Trading P&L since the peak
- −$309
- Net flow since the peak
- −$0
- deposits / withdrawals
- $0 / $0
- Equity change
- −$309
Exact by construction: the exchange’s own accounting makes every change in account value either P&L or flow (Δequity = ΔP&L + net flow), and the two above reconcile to $0. An account can shed most of its equity while trading
profitably, and a rising one can be hiding losses behind deposits.
Net flow comes from Pacifica’s own accounting (account_equity − pnl from /portfolio), which reconciles to its deposit/withdrawal ledger to the cent.
101 equity points on file.
Risk : reward and frequency closed round trips only
Risk : reward
1 : 44.63
risks $1 on average to make $58
Win rate
94.3%
3086 of 3274 closed trades
Expectancy
+$54
per trade · 42.01R
Profit factor
732.56
gross $177,899 / $243
Best trade
+$17,119
worst −$22
Trades / active month
654.8
5 active months of 36
Median gap
0.0d
longest quiet stretch 3d
Win / loss split
3086 / 188
Read risk : reward as "risks 1 to make N" — average loss against average win.
On its own it says nothing: 1 : 5 at a 10% hit rate loses money. Read it with the
win rate beside it, or read expectancy, which already combines the two.
PnL and drawdown mark-to-market P&L, account equity, and the underwater curve
Net P&L
+$80,621
peak $80,930 · low −$18,337
Capital injected
$502,712
withdrew $98,881 · net +$403,831
Peak equity
$485,261
now $484,952
Profit on capital
+16.0%
on $503,206 ever put in
Max drawdown
−$21,272
peak-to-trough · Aug 2026
… of peak equity
−4.4%
against $485,261, the largest the account was ever
seen to hold
… of capital committed
−4.2%
against $503,206
ever put in
Longest underwater
20d
below a previous peak
Average leverage
0.03×
median 0.00× · peak 13.11× · 3274 trades
Sampling
1.0d
101 points · 25 Jun 2026 → 03 Oct 2026
The P&L line is mark-to-market — it comes from the exchange’s own
pnlHistory and already carries open-position profit, not just closed trades. What it is not is
continuous:
portfolio returns about a hundred points whatever the account’s age,
so this wallet is sampled every 1.0 days and any drawdown that opened and
closed between two samples is invisible. Every drawdown figure above is a floor, not the true
worst. Continuous intraday drawdown only starts accumulating from the position tracker, which
has been running since 12 Sep. The two percentages divide the same dollar loss by different things:
There is no single right denominator, so both are named rather than one being picked:
the largest the account was ever seen to hold, and every dollar ever committed to it. Either
can pass 100% on a leveraged account — this wallet gave back
$21,272 against a peak P&L of $80,930. Dividing by peak
P&L is deliberately not shown as a headline: on a wallet that was barely profitable before
losing, it produces numbers in the thousands of percent. A drawdown measured on raw account value is
deliberately not shown at all: this wallet withdrew
$98,881, so its account value fell
−9.7% from peak — a figure that reads like a blow-up and is
nothing of the kind. Every drawdown above is measured on P&L, which withdrawals cannot
move.Current trades open perp positions and spot holdings, live
Open perp positions · 0
| Coin | Side | Size | Value | Unreal. | Lev | Liq px |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flat — or not tracked | ||||||
Spot holdings · 0
| Token | Qty | Value | Cost | Unreal. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| no spot balance stored | ||||
Recent trades last 5 closed round trips
| Coin | Side | Entry | Exit | Hold | Notional | Lev | Fills | Fees | Net PnL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEARliq | Long | 03 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 03 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 3s | $182 | 0.00× | 2 | $0 | +$0 |
| NEARliq | Short | 03 Oct 2026, 18:15 | 03 Oct 2026, 18:15 | 3s | $3,630 | 0.01× | 3 | $2 | +$11 |
| NEARliq | Short | 03 Oct 2026, 16:07 | 03 Oct 2026, 16:07 | 3s | $725 | 0.00× | 3 | $0 | +$3 |
| NEARliq | Short | 03 Oct 2026, 16:02 | 03 Oct 2026, 16:02 | 3s | $4,195 | 0.01× | 15 | $2 | +$139 |
| NEARliq | Short | 03 Oct 2026, 16:01 | 03 Oct 2026, 16:01 | 3s | $3,478 | 0.01× | 8 | $2 | +$84 |
A round trip is flat→flat: fill → order → decision → campaign, with same-millisecond fills re-chained by
startPosition and TWAP slices merged by tid. 0 still open.History by coin · every fill Pacifica serves from 26 Jun 2026 · 7 coins
| Coin | Trips | Win rate | Realised | Taken from open | Funding | Open now | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 1878 | 93% | +$96,980 | — | +$0 | — | +$96,980 |
| ETH | 617 | 93% | +$39,061 | — | — | — | +$39,061 |
| HYPE | 435 | 97% | +$27,344 | — | +$3 | — | +$27,347 |
| ZEC | 91 | 98% | +$7,157 | — | — | — | +$7,157 |
| SOL | 216 | 97% | +$4,509 | — | — | — | +$4,509 |
| LIT | 18 | 100% | +$1,856 | — | — | — | +$1,856 |
| NEAR | 19 | 100% | +$749 | — | — | — | +$749 |
| Coins in these fills | 3274 | 94% | +$177,656 | — | +$3 | — | +$177,660 |
| Before the fill history | what the account made before the oldest fill read here — Pacifica’s own P/L less the coins above | −$97,038 | |||||
| Account total | Pacifica’s own P/L for the account | +$80,621 | |||||
Built from Pacifica’s public fill history: every fill says whether it opens or closes and what it realised. A coin’s total is its closed round trips, the profit taken from positions still open, the funding it paid or received, and the open position at Pacifica’s own mark price. The total reconciles to Pacifica’s own P/L for the account.