History before the first observation was NOT rebuilt for 3 of 3 point(s). Aster's P/L excludes commission and funding; on this account's volume, commission alone could be up to $286 since 26 Aug, against a rebuilt equity of $-2,839 -- a negative balance, which is impossible and proves the missing term. The curve is observed from the first snapshot and builds forward.

Flows on file: BSC deposits from 29 Jul 2026, Arbitrum all-time, plus every flow in the explorer's complete history for this account.

Monthly record: realised P/L by the day positions closed, before commission and funding, from Aster's own leaderboard. Its 24-hour, 7, 14 and 30-day windows are read daily; each counts what closed inside it plus the open positions' whole unrealised P/L, so only the differences between windows are clean — exact realised P/L over fixed past days, reaching 30 days behind the first reading. A month shows a value once the readings pin it exactly, and until then its longest exactly-known stretch (hover for the days). Open positions are in Current trades.

Net flow comes from Aster’s treasury contracts on BSC, Arbitrum and Ethereum, plus the Aster Chain explorer — every deposit and withdrawal as an on-chain event, valued at the hour it happened. 45 equity points on file.

The P&L line is mark-to-market — it comes from the exchange’s own pnlHistory and already carries open-position profit, not just closed trades. What it is not is continuous: portfolio returns about a hundred points whatever the account’s age, so this wallet is sampled every 1.0 days and any drawdown that opened and closed between two samples is invisible. Every drawdown figure above is a floor, not the true worst. Continuous intraday drawdown only starts accumulating from the position tracker, which has been running since 12 Sep. The two percentages divide the same dollar loss by different things: There is no single right denominator, so both are named rather than one being picked: the largest the account was ever seen to hold, and every dollar ever committed to it. Either can pass 100% on a leveraged account — this wallet gave back $2,119 against a peak P&L of $67,984. Dividing by peak P&L is deliberately not shown as a headline: on a wallet that was barely profitable before losing, it produces numbers in the thousands of percent. A drawdown measured on raw account value is deliberately not shown at all: this wallet withdrew $30,000, so its account value fell −15.1% from peak — a figure that reads like a blow-up and is nothing of the kind. Every drawdown above is measured on P&L, which withdrawals cannot move.

Rebuilt from public data: every order the Aster Chain explorer records, matched to the fills Aster’s public tape printed for it, replayed against the positions the explorer reported at every refresh. A trip is listed only where nothing contradicts it; one the explorer’s own position and realised P/L confirm is reconciled, one that closed before any snapshot is marked rebuilt. P/L is before commission and funding, which Aster does not publish for another account.
No round trips yet: this trader's orders are still being matched to Aster's public tape (a few hundred per refresh).