How this equity curve was built nobody publishes one for Aster
Not ranked on the 30-day board, so nothing before the first observation can be rebuilt.
Flows on file: BSC deposits from 29 Jul 2026, Arbitrum all-time, plus every flow in the explorer's complete history for this account.
Monthly record: realised P/L by the day positions closed, before commission and funding, from Aster's own leaderboard. Its 24-hour, 7, 14 and 30-day windows are read daily; each counts what closed inside it plus the open positions' whole unrealised P/L, so only the differences between windows are clean — exact realised P/L over fixed past days, reaching 30 days behind the first reading. A month shows a value once the readings pin it exactly, and until then its longest exactly-known stretch (hover for the days). Open positions are in Current trades.
Capital what they started with and everything moved since
Starting capital
$69,019
equity on 24 Sep 2026, before that day’s flow
Cash injected
$0
every deposit since
Cash withdrawn
$50,000
net moved out
Net injected
−$50,000
deposits − withdrawals
Total ever invested
$69,019
starting capital + deposits
Profit over window
+$611
24 Sep 2026 → 07 Nov 2026
Return on invested
+0.9%
profit ÷ every dollar put in
Peak equity
$70,229
now $19,630
Equity fell $50,599 from its peak on
05 Oct 2026 — was that trading or cashing out?
Both · 1% of the fall is trading, 99% is money taken out
- Trading P&L since the peak
- −$599
- Net flow since the peak
- −$50,000
- deposits / withdrawals
- $0 / $50,000
- Equity change
- −$50,599
The flows above are exact on-chain events. The trading figure is not independent: before the first observed snapshot, equity was rebuilt from Δequity = ΔP&L + net flow using Aster’s leaderboard P&L, which excludes commission and funding. An account can shed most of its equity while trading
profitably, and a rising one can be hiding losses behind deposits.
Net flow comes from Aster’s treasury contracts on BSC, Arbitrum and Ethereum, plus the Aster Chain explorer — every deposit and withdrawal as an on-chain event, valued at the hour it happened.
45 equity points on file.
Risk : reward and frequency closed round trips only
no closed round trips
PnL and drawdown mark-to-market P&L, account equity, and the underwater curve
Net P&L
+$953
peak $3,226 · low −$1,281
Capital injected
$0
withdrew $50,000 · net −$50,000
Peak equity
$70,229
now $19,630
Profit on capital
+0.9%
on $69,019 ever put in
Max drawdown
−$3,630
peak-to-trough · Oct 2026
… of peak equity
−5.2%
against $70,229, the largest the account was ever
seen to hold
… of capital committed
−5.3%
against $69,019
ever put in
Longest underwater
21d
below a previous peak
Average leverage
—×
median —× · peak —× · 0 trades
Sampling
1.0d
45 points · 24 Sep 2026 → 07 Nov 2026
The P&L line is mark-to-market — it comes from the exchange’s own
pnlHistory and already carries open-position profit, not just closed trades. What it is not is
continuous:
portfolio returns about a hundred points whatever the account’s age,
so this wallet is sampled every 1.0 days and any drawdown that opened and
closed between two samples is invisible. Every drawdown figure above is a floor, not the true
worst. Continuous intraday drawdown only starts accumulating from the position tracker, which
has been running since 12 Sep. The two percentages divide the same dollar loss by different things:
There is no single right denominator, so both are named rather than one being picked:
the largest the account was ever seen to hold, and every dollar ever committed to it. Either
can pass 100% on a leveraged account — this wallet gave back
$3,630 against a peak P&L of $3,226. Dividing by peak
P&L is deliberately not shown as a headline: on a wallet that was barely profitable before
losing, it produces numbers in the thousands of percent. A drawdown measured on raw account value is
deliberately not shown at all: this wallet withdrew
$50,000, so its account value fell
−75.2% from peak — a figure that reads like a blow-up and is
nothing of the kind. Every drawdown above is measured on P&L, which withdrawals cannot
move.Current trades open perp positions and spot holdings, live
Open perp positions · 2
· account 0.57×
| Coin | Long/Short | Open Interest | 3D OI | Notional | Unrealized | Lev | Liq px |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIGHTUSDT | LONG | 1,543,244.0000 | 1,543,244.0000 | $6,004 | +$596 | 2.0× | — |
| HOMEUSDT | LONG | 970,858.0000 | 970,858.0000 | $5,178 | +$179 | 3.0× | — |
Spot holdings · 1
| Token | Size | Value | Cost | Unrealized |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDT | 18,931.1005 | $18,931 | — | — |
Recent trades closed in the last 30 days · 0 closed
| Coin | Long/Short | In | Out | Hold | Size | Notional | Lev | Fills | Fees | Gross P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no round trip closed in the last 30 days | ||||||||||
Rebuilt from public data: every order the Aster Chain explorer records, matched to the fills Aster’s public tape printed for it, replayed against the positions the explorer reported at every refresh. A trip is listed only where nothing contradicts it; one the explorer’s own position and realised P/L confirm is reconciled, one that closed before any snapshot is marked rebuilt. P/L is before commission and funding, which Aster does not publish for another account.
No round trips yet: this trader's orders are still being matched to Aster's public tape (a few hundred per refresh).
No round trips yet: this trader's orders are still being matched to Aster's public tape (a few hundred per refresh).
Trade history every closed round trip on record · 0 closed · click a title to sort
| Coin | Long/Short | In | Out | Hold | Size | Notional | Lev | Fills | Fees | Gross P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no closed round trips | ||||||||||
History every closed round trip on record, grouped by coin · 0 coins
| Coin | Gross P/L | Trades | Win rate | L / S | Avg hold | Notional | Avg lev | Fees | Share | Last |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no closed round trips | ||||||||||